Hourtick looks at first like yet another tasks-chat-and-timesheets bundle for small teams, and then does something we haven’t seen elsewhere: it puts AI agents on the roster. Hand a task to Claude, GPT or Grok through its MCP server, and the agent’s work shows up like an employee’s — time spent, cost incurred, tasks handed between agents. There’s an API playground, an OpenAPI spec and an llms.txt; this is a team tool built by people who assume half the team isn’t human anymore.
That accounting angle is quietly the interesting part. Everyone is bolting agents onto workflows; almost nobody can answer “what did the agent cost us this week, and on what?” A timesheet for the robots is a genuinely novel answer.
What it costs
Free for whole teams at the base tier, with paid plans scaling up (we saw plans from roughly $10 through the $50–70 range on the pricing page). The free tier is the right test: if the agent-tracking works there, the upgrade argues for itself.
What we can’t tell you
Whether teams actually live in it. The tasks-chat-tracking triple is Slack, Asana and Toggl’s turf, and the switching cost is social, not technical. The realistic adoption path is narrower: use it as the ledger for your agent workforce alongside whatever the humans already use, and let it earn a bigger seat if the agent side proves out.
The details
| What it is | Tasks, team chat and time tracking that treats AI agents as team members |
| Price | Free team tier · paid plans from ~$10 |
| Best for | Teams delegating real work to agents who want the hours and costs on a clock |
| Think twice if | You need the humans to migrate too — that’s a culture project, not a tool swap |
